Don’t blame Saudi for Britain attacking Syria, blame Britain and Mr Obama. Britain owns Saudi.
The Iraq war was continuous, no first and second, perhaps you should have been there throughout the 1990s.
Again don’t blame Saudi for Yemen, again Britain. As I’ve said a million times Syria has little to do with gas pipelines, it was to do with ridding the world of welfarism and the restructuring of the region, again Britain.
Of course its all about the monopoly game but Saudi doesn’t control that. The oil crisis in the early 1970s enabled the restructuring of the World Bank and IMF and of course neo-liberalism.
Oh they were after President Hafez for decades, since his formation of a Ba’ath Party in Syria.
We can all say that we knew Syria would be after Iraq, shame you didn’t say it years ago, I might have had some allies, could have done with them too.
The awful thing is that Dr Bashar is naive (though he could have sprited up by now). He was warned not to open the border North East of Qamishli at Ein Diwer Bridge, but he did allowing the flooding in of Turkish Kurdish. He was told not to talk to the Syrian Brothers, but he did allowing Christian churches to come under attack, hope he’s learned now.
Yeah chem attacks were counter-intuitive, It was the same in Lebanon in 2005 when Mr Hariri was killed, Syria was blamed but it didn’t make sense as Syria was then forced to remove Syrian troops from Tripoli where there are a lot of Sunnis who support the Islamists now invading Syria. It was either Britain as it wanted war or more likely the Israelis, who wanted the Syrian troops to go as the Israelis had withdrawn already, though the Lebanese Forces were left, but a lot of them have changed sides now, or at least are more moderate.
Everyone watches and believes mainstream news , very few people here and there see the lies
LikeLike
Don’t blame Saudi for Britain attacking Syria, blame Britain and Mr Obama. Britain owns Saudi.
The Iraq war was continuous, no first and second, perhaps you should have been there throughout the 1990s.
Again don’t blame Saudi for Yemen, again Britain. As I’ve said a million times Syria has little to do with gas pipelines, it was to do with ridding the world of welfarism and the restructuring of the region, again Britain.
Of course its all about the monopoly game but Saudi doesn’t control that. The oil crisis in the early 1970s enabled the restructuring of the World Bank and IMF and of course neo-liberalism.
Oh they were after President Hafez for decades, since his formation of a Ba’ath Party in Syria.
We can all say that we knew Syria would be after Iraq, shame you didn’t say it years ago, I might have had some allies, could have done with them too.
The awful thing is that Dr Bashar is naive (though he could have sprited up by now). He was warned not to open the border North East of Qamishli at Ein Diwer Bridge, but he did allowing the flooding in of Turkish Kurdish. He was told not to talk to the Syrian Brothers, but he did allowing Christian churches to come under attack, hope he’s learned now.
Yeah chem attacks were counter-intuitive, It was the same in Lebanon in 2005 when Mr Hariri was killed, Syria was blamed but it didn’t make sense as Syria was then forced to remove Syrian troops from Tripoli where there are a lot of Sunnis who support the Islamists now invading Syria. It was either Britain as it wanted war or more likely the Israelis, who wanted the Syrian troops to go as the Israelis had withdrawn already, though the Lebanese Forces were left, but a lot of them have changed sides now, or at least are more moderate.
LikeLike